Many things in life have a way to turn around and bite. No one gets exempted. Playing the blame game for this is neither an option nor a solution. Choices made without due consideration of cause and effect, turns the hoped-for happy tidings ends up in living a bad dream.
The smart phone. This device makes an innocent entry, probably due to personal desire or as an answer to social pressure. Soon, two or more devices of different make sneak in. After some time, the children in the house lay claim over them as their own pets! Any time of the day, they surf, watch and play declaring time out for study. Rob Smith, whose intention would have been to make this device more "user friendly"- can he be blamed now?The next in line will most probably be a notebook or an iPad. By the time the adults get the hang of it, the children have become master navigators, drawing upon their smartphone experience.
Parents scream and queue up, to plead for a once in a while chance for using the device! Steve Job and others might have thought that these devices would be helpful to the breadwinners. Are they to be made scapegoats and blamed?The family, children included, line up enough justifications for the next gadget-a big screen smart TV. Multiplex cinema tickets+ popcorn buckets costing a king's ransom, and the aged TV needing overdue replacement swings the needle of judgement of parents. Not to miss out, the smart children weigh in saying," Now, the choice will be available to watch "any time, any program" comfortably at home" Crunchies costing less than popcorn buckets and zero travel expenses - can this recurring savings be ignored? Additional weight to the justification.Parents fail to get their intel right-Children aggressively take over control of this supposed homegrown multiplex and turn it into a theater for battle of nerves. The big screen gets its audience and hears the background score of parents.
To suppress this noise, children play the home alone card - a psychological power ploy. Exploiting this situation, the children manage to get a Xbox!Who gets the blame - John Baird for coming up with the idea for TV, Fast France and hp for smart TV? Microsoft for Xbox? If so, the choicest blame will have to be laid on the shoulders of the duo - Bob Kahn and Vint Cerf who made today's internet possible. Can the search engines, for bringing the world of knowledge at the drop of a hat, be left out?
An innocent visitor who has already established a firm hold in the house is junk food and fast food. Children badgered and parents relented. What appeared as an easy solution, to the stressed-out office goers, has become yet another problem to tackle.
Even listing out the kilometer long brand names of fast and junk foods, to shift the blame, is now a taxing task! Things that stood by as contingency measures have been granted permanency. Parents, who were initiators and spectators-in-awe, are now -on- split your hair routine. What they dangled as "carrots" to children to perform their academic chores, has left the "stick" with them, wondering what to do with it! Clenching jaws, gnawing at the lips and learning to contort facial muscles at different angles have become anger control measures. Visits to dental clinics, seeking remedies to stop the crunching of teeth becomes an extracurricular activity for the parents.
Reaching wits end, a different type of blame game begins. Parents argue-children should understand the stress at home and workplaces and co-operate. Children counter-they too are equally stressed at school and home. Spending hours with Smart devices may harm inherent smartness-parents try another track to run their thought train.With or without, there are children who are couch potatoes. With or without, there are smart ones and not so smart ones. With or without children wear glasses and do or not do well academically. These counters from children speed through like bullet trains!
Now comes the impasse. With both parents and children hardening their respective stands, the verbal exchange results in the proverbial "hen or egg, which came first?"
Parents wanted to say but didn't, "Essentials are different from those that give us comfort and luxury. Were they not brought home to raise standard of living?" If posed with this question, the children will no doubt be unanimous in blaming the elders. So, they did not.
The children wanted to say, but didn't, "The onus is on the user - to be constructive". They too did not.
The children soon become multi-device, multi-channel experts. The "carrots and stick" trick has backfired. Parents stand dumb struck, wondering whether "smart devices" might have helped the children to line up such convincing thoughts. after all!
They realised that they are singing out of sync with the children's orchestra! Status quo is anathema to Science & Technology. Efforts to make better things best are never slackened. The emotionally drained parents could not do anything but to blame themselves for WFH and WTH syndromes, which nudged the children to make friends with smart devices. Whatever is said and done, the children have possession of the remote and the last laugh!